Search
An association of writers working to advance literature, defend free expression, and to foster international literary fellowship.
FREEDOM TO WRITE
FTW In the USA
Surveillance
Secrecy
torture and basic human rights
FTW Around the World
Rapid Action Network
Individual Cases
campaigns
Press Room
multimedia
Resources
FTW Award
Support FTW
Contact FTW
spacer
Newsletter
spacer

November 1, 2004 | Wall Street Journal | Nobel Laureate sues U.S.
When Ms. Ebadi sought to publish her memoirs in the U.S., she was startled to discover that doing so would be illegal, under a trade embargo intended to punish repressive governments such as the regime in Tehran that once sent her to jail. >> More
September 29, 2004 | New York Times | Ending Editorial Oversight at the Treasury Department
No matter how the Treasury Department's ruling is framed, denying editorial cooperation of this kind deprives us as much as it does the sanctioned countries. >> More
September 30, 2004 | New York Sun | Trade groups sue Treasury on Freedom of Speech issues
Two publishing trade organizations have jointly filed suit against the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control in a New York federal court. >> More
Home > 9/29/04

September 29, 2004 | New York Times | Ending Editorial Oversight at the Treasury Department

Editorial Page | New York Times

This week, a group of American publishers filed suit against the Treasury secretary and the Office of Foreign Assets Control at the Treasury Department concerning an issue percolating since last September: the editing of books and manuscripts from countries, like Iran and Sudan, that are the targets of sanctions. Last year, the office issued a ruling that allowed the publication of finished works from those countries but made it illegal for Americans to edit them or consult with an author about editorial changes. The ostensible goal was to deny economic benefits to hostile foreign countries. The actual result was to impair the principle of freedom of information, a cornerstone of American democracy.

Last spring, the Treasury Department promised to clarify the ruling in hopes of making the uproar go away. The clarification did not really help. By law, information and informational materials are exempt from regulation under economic sanctions. The department's clarification allowed certain editorial activities, like the normal peer review of scholarly articles. But it upheld the department's right to decide which kinds of editorial services were permitted and which were not.

The groups that are suing the department, including the Association of American University Presses and the PEN American Center, argue that the ruling violates the law.

It also violates common sense. No matter how the Treasury Department's ruling is framed, denying editorial cooperation of this kind deprives us as much as it does the sanctioned countries. It keeps new work from being published in this country, and it creates the legitimate impression that our freedoms are no longer as free as they once were.

The United States should be doing everything it can to encourage freedom of information. Most of the countries under trade sanctions enjoy extremely limited freedoms. One of the most effective things America can do when it comes to spreading our principles is to offer the exercise of real intellectual freedom to authors from sanctioned countries.

Copyright © 2004 The New York Times. All rights reserved.

>> Back to Press


Home | Site Map | Copyright / Privacy Policy | Contact Us © 2004-2012 PEN American Center. All rights reserved.