Search
An association of writers working to advance literature, defend free expression, and to foster international literary fellowship. JOIN PEN!  Become an Associate Member today. Sign the petition for free expression in China
membership
PEN Members
Become A Member
membership renewal
Personal Web Pages
PEN Blog Roll
member events
Member News
member publications
Associate Membership
Associates Exchange
volunteer
Branches
Pen Tributes
contact us
ganda

Make your voice heard.
Click here to participate in the Forum and let us know what you think.
Home > Lolette Kuby | |

Lolette Kuby
11/3/05

I do object to having my published/copyrighted works made available to the public via the Google Print Library Project.

Aren't there copyright laws that prohibit the duplication of an entire copyrighted book? Why should Google be exempted from this?

Should entire libraries, financed by public funds and philanthropies, accumulated with laborious discretion over hundred of years, simply be transferred to a corporation?

No doubt Google will benefit by increased advertising revenues and stock market prices, but how will the libraries benefit?

Google would jeopardize the library system itself—the beginning of the end of the public library as we know it?

Google says it will display only a few sentences surrounding the highlighted term. What happens if the highlighted term appears many times in a given work? Will there be no limit on the total number of words displayed?

The only advantage to the author I can see would be stimulating interest in a given book, but even that advantage would apply only to the small number of books that are still in copyright and also still in print.

[Back to Membership Forum Responses]

Grants & Awards online database.  Sign up today!Support PEN.org.  Every donation counts
Home | Site Map | Copyright / Privacy Policy | Contact Us © 2004-2008 PEN American Center. All rights reserved.